Tom:
could he be referring the 100K to retirement pay, and insurance coverage's
and such? I wonder if it'd come close, including all benefits?
Henry
----- Original Message -----
From: <audiolaw@aol.com>
To: <diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [diesel_mercedes] They LIED
> Brad:
>
> What do you mean when you say that you don't want to start a political
> firestorm, and then follow that with the statement below?
>
> There are PUBLIC RECORDS available that political activists pore over.
> NONE of them has been able to document any number of teachers drawing
> $100K+ / year pensions.
>
> If your political beliefs depend on intentionally false statements,
> how long before you are following candidates who tell you to believe that
> the
> world is flat?
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 6/10/2012 5:23:27 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> brad_macaboy1234@yahoo.com writes:
>
> Here, we finance public obligations thru property taxation; a nice house
> like those found in mid level neighborhoods in CA would be from $5 to
> 15K/yr
> in property tax. I guess it is to be expected when retiring teachers and
> other civil servants receive $100K+/yr pensions.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment