Re: [diesel_mercedes] Charging Lamp

 

Well, I haven't had the battery die yet, light is still working as I described.  Today when I got home I left the engine running and checked the voltage.  It was 12.2, reved the engine a bit and no change didn't force a charge.  The light on the dash goes off completely at about 35mph and above.

I've got a brand new Bosch voltage regulator in there, it's probably got 100 miles on it.

I'm thinking of picking up one of those cigarette lighter voltmeters to see what it's doing.

I was surprised the battery ground goes to sheet metal and not the engine/tranny bell housing, I'll have to add a ground cable.

Bud



On Sunday, January 12, 2014 9:23 AM, "vwnate1@yahoo.com" <vwnate1@yahoo.com> wrote:
 


O.K. Bud ;

Sounds good .

In many older vehicles , over time resistance builds up so the charging light will glow faintly as you drive when all is well .

Just get a DC voltmeter or $5 Harbor Freight Multi-Meter and check the voltage across the center of the battery's posts , while the engine is running ~ if it's below 13 VDC , rev. the engine ~ not much , don't rev. the pi$$ out of it trying to force it to charge ~ the voltage will either ride to 13 + VDC as soon as the engine revs up or it won't .

If it doesn't , the brushes in the alternator are prolly bad , even if it's a rebuilt unit .

If the voltage rises , try it again with the lights and HVAC fan going , these 55 Ampere alternators don't have much extra so 12.7 VDC with everything going is O.K. , don't panic .

Get a flashlight and look at the round black thing on the back of the alternator ~ unless it clearly says " BOSCH " on it , it's crap , _period_ go to a Partshaus and order up a BOSH brand ( ! only !) # 1 197 311 02X voltage regulator , it comes with new brushes and you can install it in 15 minutes or so .

The last digit isn't important , might be 2 , 5 , 7 , whatever .

I carry one in my glove box as I travel a lot and don't want to have to go to M-B Dealer if it poops out , FLAPS will only ever have crappo off branded junk ones on the shelf , they're NO DANG GOOD because the charge at a very low rate .

If you like to tinker , the red 1.5 MM wires connecting the alternator to the battery etc. have brass ring connectors that can be hand polished then you replace the tiny Metric screws & washers that hold them to the black plastic box the all join in , sometimes this helps bot the charge rate and the glowing charge light .

Unless you personally added  a battery ground to engine cable , it needs one .

-Nate
(who keeps a BOSCH voltage regulator next to my computer so folks will always get the right one !)


Bud Wrote :

OK, I have no idea what I really did today. Removed the cluster the other day enough to get to the bulbs. Found bulbs missing for brake pad wear sensors, no bulb for seat belt, no bulb for high beam.
Put new bulbs in except for high beam(there was no receptacle for it). Turned the key to on and same ole same ole, just a warning light for emergency brake & preglow.
Took the main connector off and reinstalled. Pushed the cluster back in. Went to start the car and got the charge indicator light, brake and preglow to come on, started the car and the charge indicator went off.
Drove it around and have very faint glow at idle on the charge indicator. My idle might be too low, the tach doesn't work. Stopped the car, restarted and got the charge indicator light on again. So I guess it's working like it's supposed to.


From: Bud S <budski252@...>;
To: diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com <diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com>;
Subject: Re: [diesel_mercedes] Charging Lamp
Sent: Thu, Jan 9, 2014 9:01:33 PM

 
Thanks Nate,
I'll try that in the next day or two.

Bud

I see you have the same typing ability as I do :0



On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:35 PM, "vwnate1@..." <vwnate1@...> wrote:
 

O.K. Bud ;

If you tuen the key on then ground the skinny wire leading to the ALTERNATOR , THE CHARGE LAMP SHOULD & MUST COME ON , IF NOT , i'D FIRST CHECK THE DASH BULB AND HOLDER , THEN THE mpc.....

Oops , damn caps lock again .

-Nate


Bud Wrote :

No, the light has never come on since I've had it.  There's always been something wrong with the charging system and I found out there was a late model VR without the "L" leg installed.  Got a Bosch with the "L" leg and it's been charging the battery since I put it in.

Bud



On Monday, January 6, 2014 5:17 PM, "vwnate1@..." <vwnate1@...> wrote:
 

No ;

This is wrong/bad .

Does the low charge light ever come on ? .

-Nate

Bud Wrote :

Just an update, since I've put the new regulator in, it's been charging like a champ.  The only oddball thing is that the battery warning light on the dash does not come on when I put the key to the glow position.  Does that sound right?

Thanks,
Bud
http://www.rhinocat.com/cvaf4u/


On Friday, December 27, 2013 12:38 PM, Bud S <budski252@...> wrote:
 
Thanks Bogy and Carl, I got a wild hair when I woke up this morning and ran the voltage regulator number Vemo V10-77-0001 that was in the car and the replacement and I called my parts house and it seems this regulator is for newer 300sd's.

Dug some more and found http://www.regitar.com/FlyerPDF/cs.pdf which gives info on regulators.  The vemo cross references to a Bosch 1197311027 which doesn't have an "L" leg for the light on the instrument panel.

No light when I turn the key to on, my understanding is the light has to excite the alternator then the light drops out.  I also get a faint glow from the brake light and I replaced the pads and sensors.

I have on order a 1197311004 that has the "L" leg, so I guess I'll see what happens when I replace it. 

Bud
http://www.rhinocat.com/cvaf4u/


On Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:35 PM, Bogy Wan Kenobi <polespearbogy@...> wrote:
 
Bud:

When you plugged the relay back in it behaved as if it was just turned on by the ignition key and began to heat the plugs. Had you given it a few seconds it would have, or at least should have, kicked off and the voltage would have risen back to the idling voltage. If it was me I would chase the alternator because I think your new regulator has failed.

I believe you can disconnect the alternator at the junction block on the right inner fender well. There should be two 'heavy' red cloth covered wires. Some models have them go from the alternator to the starter and then up to the junction block and some go right to the junction block from the alternator. Disconnect them and then attach them to a load like a headlight. Then measure the voltage. If it is still 12.?? volts then the regulator has failed. If it is up to 14.? volts then you have a heavy load or wiring problem.

Just to put it in perspective, one of those heavy wires goes right to the glow plug relay as supply power for the plugs. The other heavy wire goes to the light switch and from there supplies the entire rest of the car. In other words - the glow plugs pull as much as, or more than, the current used by the whole rest of the car.

COLD glow plugs pull upwards of 75 amps for the pencil type. That quickly drops as the plugs warm up. But that initial load  can drop the battery voltage a volt or two. If you disconnect the glow plugs and the voltage rises up to 14.5 volts then you have a GP relay issue. But you have to disconnect the plug with the heavy wires at the glow plug relay. It's the bigger of the two plugs.

Alternatively, you could place a 60 or 80 amp meter between the two heavy red wires and the junction block. Give it 15 minutes to allow for battery charging. A "lot" of current (40 to 80 Amps) flowing during those 15 minutes is the alternator charging the battery. If you only get a few amps or no amps during that 15 minutes then your alternator is bad. But if the current stays maxed out at 40 to 80 amps then you have a wiring problem. If it never goes up you have an alternator/regulator problem.

But your description of the problem sounds more like a failed regulator/alternator to me.

You could pull the alternator and have it tested. But Autozone and checker can't do it. You will have to take it to an auto electric guy or maybe NAPA or such.

This is just my two cents.
But FWIW, I am an electrical engineer.
Bogy.




On Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:43 PM, diyernh <diyernh@...> wrote:


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (16)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[diesel_mercedes] RE: Front/Rear Glass replacement.. w126

 

did you "source" your own glass-- or just hand it off to a body/autoglass shop?

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[diesel_mercedes] Re: Front/Rear Glass replacement.. w126

 

Personally, after 35 years I felt my 2 cars (and their drivers) deserved two brand new tinted glass. I am a happy camper. The rear windows will last another 35 years.

--- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, AJ RN <ajrn@...> wrote:
>
> The rear has the legendary de-laminaton..
> The front had two stone chips-- the first I was told wasn't a candidate for the "repair" stuff they do-- a second happened about a week later..
>
> ...that turned into a "mustache" last week..
>
> My "other" 300SD has similar glass-- so "parts car" won't help here..
>
> Thoughts about Safelite replacement?? Better or worse than "junkyard replacement?"
>
> I emailed safelite for a "quote..." The car is liability only, for insurance-- so it's "out of pocket" no matter what the route..
>
> Do front screens become "brittle?" Did 'Ma Benz' ever sort out the delamination on the rear screens? I think 90% of the ones I see roaming NW ohio have "some degree" of it..
>
> The car is going to continue being my daughter (17's) daily driver.. Her goal is to keep it "forever..." So I try not to much around going "cheap" here.. The car doesn't look at at the moment.. *shrug*
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
> ...no trees were injured in the delivery of this email.
> Some electrons WERE inconvenienced, however.
>

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[diesel_mercedes] Re: Glow Plugs

 

Well said Bogy. Reminded me of my 1960's days when mil specs were a part of my daily life.

--- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, Bogy Wan Kenobi <polespearbogy@...> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth I am going to weigh in again on this issue of replacing electrical parts that aren't bad.
>
> Here is my take on the matter - DON'T DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> It is a waste of time and effort. Let me explain using an example from the field of electronics.
>
> When an integrated circuit manufacturer runs a batch of logic chips they are all tested before they are put into those funny centipede looking packages. And of course some of them fail and are never packaged. Once packaged they are expected to conform to the specifications in the book for things like range of operating temperatures, range of voltages, propagation delays etc. Some manufacturers test their chips after packaging and usually a few more will fall out.
>
> Enter the military. The military demands chips with a wider range of temperatures, a wider range of voltages without damage to the chip, and usually faster propagation times, among other parameters. Now there are not separate processes for making military chips vs civilian chips. They simply expose a batch of chips to the military extremes of temperature and voltage and require them to perform faster under those extremes. And a certain percentage will fail. The remaining ones that pass are marked with the mil spec labeling and are sold for a premium.
>
> My point is that there is no difference between the mil spec chips and the standard chips except for the pure chance that some will survive the harsher testing.  Those that survive are stronger than the rest - precisely because they survived.
>
>  The point is that the longer a glow plug (or any electrical part) survives, the longer it is likely to survive. It's a stronger part. It's just chance that it got built that way. But if it has not blown out then it is surviving. The construction methods are not so exacting that it can be predicted to the minute when it will fail. They are just good enough to warrant that they will last at least so long. It's a minimum. And there is no maximum.
>
> For example, I haven't replaced a glow plug in my 81 wagon in 3 years now. And I had to replace two.
>
> Before that it was 2 more years. I replaced two of them at that time as well. 
>
>
> Go back two more years and I replaced three.
>
> You can't tell up front how long a plug will last - that is a function of time. But as time went on I eventually had a full set of above average (or mil spec, if you will) plugs. Eventually the weakest of them may go out and the replacement for it may or may not be as strong. But sooner or later that hole will have a plug that is above average. It may not be the first one I put in. But eventually . . . the statistics are in my favor. But if I replace them all because one blows out then I may well be replacing 4 superior parts with, say, 3 inferior ones and 1 superior one. The superior ones will work forever. But the only way to tell is to let them prove themselves. 
>
> Try this - keep a record of the plugs that go bad and when you replace them. But only replace the ones that go bad.
>
> Eventually you will see that certain plugs have not had to be replaced in a long time. Those are the ones you have proven over time by the standard stresses of daily use and they have survived. For me it's  been at better than 3 years since I have replaced a plug. It's actually pushing 4.
>
> But if you insist on replacing them all and want to sell the good ones you pulled, I will consider buying them. I would rather buy well tested parts than take a chance on a new one that may not last a year.
>
>
> Bogy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:51 PM, brian's 83 300d's <bstromsoe@...> wrote:
>
> PS - Replacing only the #1 cylinder glow plug solved the starting issue. Now I just have to decide whether I want to replace the other 4 or wait until I get another dead one.
>
> --- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, <vwnate1@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Smart man Brian ! .
> >
> > Occasionally I'll push after the pain and I always suffer when I do .
> >
> > Take it slow and easy , once you don't rush , the job gets easier and faster too .
> >
> > -Nate
> >
> > 
> >
> > 
> >      Brian Wrote :
> >
> >  I had forgotten what a wonderful adventure it is to get my big fat hands down into those little itty bitty spaces. Finished #1 and did not drop anything. That is an accomplishment. Might do #2 this afternoon or tomorrow. I'm like Nate, I quit when my back hurts.
> > 
> >  brian from la verne
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>
>     http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
>

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (61)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Re: [diesel_mercedes] Re: Glow Plugs

 

For what it's worth I am going to weigh in again on this issue of replacing electrical parts that aren't bad.

Here is my take on the matter - DON'T DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is a waste of time and effort. Let me explain using an example from the field of electronics.

When an integrated circuit manufacturer runs a batch of logic chips they are all tested before they are put into those funny centipede looking packages. And of course some of them fail and are never packaged. Once packaged they are expected to conform to the specifications in the book for things like range of operating temperatures, range of voltages, propagation delays etc. Some manufacturers test their chips after packaging and usually a few more will fall out.

Enter the military. The military demands chips with a wider range of temperatures, a wider range of voltages without damage to the chip, and usually faster propagation times, among other parameters. Now there are not separate processes for making military chips vs civilian chips. They simply expose a batch of chips to the military extremes of temperature and voltage and require them to perform faster under those extremes. And a certain percentage will fail. The remaining ones that pass are marked with the mil spec labeling and are sold for a premium.

My point is that there is no difference between the mil spec chips and the standard chips except for the pure chance that some will survive the harsher testing.  Those that survive are stronger than the rest - precisely because they survived.

 The point is that the longer a glow plug (or any electrical part) survives, the longer it is likely to survive. It's a stronger part. It's just chance that it got built that way. But if it has not blown out then it is surviving. The construction methods are not so exacting that it can be predicted to the minute when it will fail. They are just good enough to warrant that they will last at least so long. It's a minimum. And there is no maximum.

For example, I haven't replaced a glow plug in my 81 wagon in 3 years now. And I had to replace two.

Before that it was 2 more years. I replaced two of them at that time as well. 

Go back two more years and I replaced three.

You can't tell up front how long a plug will last - that is a function of time. But as time went on I eventually had a full set of above average (or mil spec, if you will) plugs. Eventually the weakest of them may go out and the replacement for it may or may not be as strong. But sooner or later that hole will have a plug that is above average. It may not be the first one I put in. But eventually . . . the statistics are in my favor. But if I replace them all because one blows out then I may well be replacing 4 superior parts with, say, 3 inferior ones and 1 superior one. The superior ones will work forever. But the only way to tell is to let them prove themselves. 

Try this - keep a record of the plugs that go bad and when you replace them. But only replace the ones that go bad.
Eventually you will see that certain plugs have not had to be replaced in a long time. Those are the ones you have proven over time by the standard stresses of daily use and they have survived. For me it's  been at better than 3 years since I have replaced a plug. It's actually pushing 4.

But if you insist on replacing them all and want to sell the good ones you pulled, I will consider buying them. I would rather buy well tested parts than take a chance on a new one that may not last a year.

Bogy




On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:51 PM, brian's 83 300d's <bstromsoe@yahoo.com> wrote:
PS - Replacing only the #1 cylinder glow plug solved the starting issue. Now I just have to decide whether I want to replace the other 4 or wait until I get another dead one.

--- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, <vwnate1@...> wrote:
>
>
> Smart man Brian ! .
>
> Occasionally I'll push after the pain and I always suffer when I do .
>
> Take it slow and easy , once you don't rush , the job gets easier and faster too .
>
> -Nate
>

>

>      Brian Wrote :
>
>  I had forgotten what a wonderful adventure it is to get my big fat hands down into those little itty bitty spaces. Finished #1 and did not drop anything. That is an accomplishment. Might do #2 this afternoon or tomorrow. I'm like Nate, I quit when my back hurts.

>  brian from la verne
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/diesel_mercedes/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/diesel_mercedes/join

    (Yahoo! ID required)


<*> To change settings via email:
    diesel_mercedes-digest@yahoogroups.com
    diesel_mercedes-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    diesel_mercedes-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/




__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (60)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___