I know all that. What I wanted to hear is what the group conscious thinks.
--- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, Bogy Wan Kenobi wrote:
>
> You may want to check this out for yourselves, but . . .
> NADA (the national automotive dealers association) came out with their own book because the kelly blue book was too honest. The NADA prices for used cars are almost always (in my experience anyways) lower than the KBB so that the auto dealers can pay you less than what they would have to pay if going by the KBB for a used car. I am constantly seeing new car dealers with signs on their lots saying they will pay 10% over NADA prices for used cars. And you know they are still going to make a profit when they sell that car to someone else. Is it just me or does anyone else see a conflict of interest here on the part of the auto industry in publishing their own book? Since Kelly was not directly profiting by the information they published I have more reason to believe that it is accurate. Honest anyway.
>
> Bogy
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/14/13, JD wrote:
>
> I have an '86 190D 2.5 5speed. ~250,000 miles. Runs well. AC, cruise control and sunroof inop. No rust, recent paint (clearcoat is failing in a few spots) Recent Nokian Entyres.
>
> The other is a '92 300D. 270,000 miles, also runs well, everything works. 17" AMG 5 spoke with Nokian Entyres. I know what NADA says just curious if the group says the same.
>
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (4) |