I'd bet, Tom, he's referring to lower on the condensation tower.......easier
to make, cheaper to make. not as refined.
But, that's just my guess.
It's .50 higher here......
Henry
----- Original Message -----
From: <audiolaw@aol.com>
To: <diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [diesel_mercedes] Re: diesel
Tony,
What do you mean by "lower quality fuel"?
Per unit measure, diesel has about 30% more available energy that
gasoline. So it isn't lower quality in energy provision. So if you're
only
paying 10% more per gallon, you come out way ahead. If you're paying 30%
more, then you're about breaking even.
Is it lower quality in viscosity, color, aroma?
"Lower quality" is a pretty vague and subjective term.
Tom
In a message dated 11/1/2011 9:39:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
aldridgetony97@yahoo.com writes:
85 cents higher than regular at some spots in Lost Wages today. It is a
shuck, diesel is a lower quality fuel that gas, should be less money. But
they
can get it so they charge it.
--- In _diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com) , "max_stemple" <jasperezra@...>
wrote:
>
> Does anyone else have diesel ..................50cents a gallon over
regular gas? Max
>
Re: [diesel_mercedes] Re: diesel
Perhaps that's what he meant. But he said "lower QUALITY" which is something different.
He's a regular here, so I'm sure that he will tell us what he meant.
Tom
In a message dated 11/1/2011 9:49:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ygmir111@att.net writes:
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment