Re: [diesel_mercedes] Re: diesel

 

Em.. (cough)  I think you are right.  I'd been thinking that the carbon tax was a disproportionate tax on liquid fuels based on their BTU content...

bk

--- On Wed, 11/2/11, Lost but making good time. <aldridgetony97@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Lost but making good time. <aldridgetony97@yahoo.com>
Subject: [diesel_mercedes] Re: diesel
To: diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2011, 8:59 PM

 

Gonna argue the carbon tax thing, it is the same in Canada, Diesel sells for more there too. & Clinton did not preside in Canada. The oil companies are bending us over with no kisses.

--- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, briankk <briankk@...> wrote:
>
> It's an artifact of Clintons carbon tax...
>
> --- On Tue, 11/1/11, Lost but making good time. <aldridgetony97@...> wrote:
>
> From: Lost but making good time. <aldridgetony97@...>
> Subject: [diesel_mercedes] Re: diesel
> To: diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 9:38 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 85 cents higher than regular at some spots in Lost Wages today. It is a shuck, diesel is a lower quality fuel that gas, should be less money. But they can get it so they charge it.
>
>
>
> --- In diesel_mercedes@yahoogroups.com, "max_stemple" <jasperezra@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Does anyone else have diesel ..................50cents a gallon over regular gas? Max
>
> >
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

No comments: