[diesel_mercedes] Re: Uro Parts

 


I got some European front turn lenses for my W-123's ~ they look O.K. but were pretty clearly poorly slapped to - gether in the factory - there's a rubber grommet that's never loose on old beat to death Mercedes' but is simply flopping loose in the Uro box .

I might glue it in place , I might just take longer installing these $5.00 lenses as the body holds the grommet in place once it's assembled .

Only time will tell if the amber plastic lens will last .

BTW : the Uro lamps only fit the early style , oval shaped bulb holders so now I have to go find a '77 W-123 to get those .

Or , I'll buy good used ones from anyone here .

-Nate
Jim wrote :
>
> Thanks, Tom. But I don't have any junkyards near where I live. So both you and Mark in Lakewood, CO think these steering wheels pop off without puller, that's good news if I do need to take it off... I'll let you know how this part looks when I receive it. I think when it comes to Chinese stuff, some is good some is bad and the branding that gets put on it (eg Uro Parts, etc) is just marketing, just a brand name and a conduit for sales. So it's a grab-bag I guess. I don't want to dick around with old parts more than I have to, and hell, if I get five more years out of this old car I should be happy. My car only has 125k miles on it. Most of the junkyard stuff will be rode harder and put up wetter than what I'm taking out. If the URO stuff is junk, I'll send it back and rebuild the old stuff, or go the junkyard route. Later this summer, turbo rebuild. That's going to be a hoot.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (24)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

[diesel_mercedes] Re : W-123 Blower Motor

 


Once you have all the accumulated dust bunnies and leaves out plus the built up fuzz carefully cleaned off the squirrel cage , you'll be amazed at how well it was designed back in 1976 ~ even at the lowest blower speed , it silently moves a LOT of air volume .

-Nate
Jim wrote :
>
> Which part was that, Nate? Maybe some are good, some not so. I don't think it would be hard to improve on that old blower motor technology, not that electric motors have changed that much over the years. But hopefully they have figured out a way to make a motor that blows more air without pulling so many amps. Hopefully at least the squirrel cage aerodynamics have improved.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (23)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___