Paul:
Let's take in small bites, shall we:
In a message dated 6/12/2012 9:39:34 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, schulzpaul@yahoo.com writes:
Well, insults and name calling seem to be the main tactic of those who can't win on facts or truth....
So that explains your use of:
"your continued pollution of this wonderful yahoo group;"
"your continued babbling;"
"your philosophical phantasies;"
" junk science."
And those just from one paragraph of one of your posts! We needn't go over all of them to establish the truth of your admission that insults and name calling are your substitute for facts and truth.
"There is just no energy benefit to using plant biomass for liquid fuel," says David Pimentel, professor of ecology and agriculture at Cornell. "These strategies are not sustainable."
This is a particularly trenchant observation, notably because, unless my education was all wrong, the petroleum with which you are so deeply in love was at one time mostly plant biomass. We call it "dino diesel" because that's so much more manly than thinking of our great cars as loping along on palm frond diesel.
But even back in the eons ago days when Teahadist philosophies were being hatched, there was vastly more plant biomass than dinosaur biomass.
So maybe what Professor Pimental is saying is that it really is ridiculous to keep pretending that we can live forever by overgorging on the limited stock of ancient biomass sourced fuels.
Tom
No comments:
Post a Comment